DxO PureRAW: What it is, how it works, and when it really makes sense to use it
- nicoruffato_photo
- 2 days ago
- 2 min read
Updated: 18 hours ago
In recent months, there has been a lot of talk about AI-based noise reduction software.
Among these, DxO PureRAW is certainly one of the most interesting because it works differently than traditional denoise tools.
In this article I want to clearly explain what PureRAW is, how it fits into your workflow, and when it really makes sense to use it.
At the end you will also find the two videos I made: one more technical and one with real field tests.
WHAT IS DXO "PURE RAW"
DxO PureRAW is a RAW file pre-processing software.
He does not work in the creative phase but in the technical one, that is:
demosaicing
noise reduction
micro-detail recovery
improved tonal transitions
optical corrections via DxO Modules
The main difference compared to other denoise is that PureRAW intervenes at the base of the file, during the reconstruction of the image
HOW IT FIT INTO THE WORKFLOW
PureRAW is used at the beginning of the workflow.
👉 we start from the RAW
👉 Processes in PureRAW
👉 you get an optimized DNG
👉 you then work in Lightroom, Photoshop or other
This means that it does not replace the editing software, but prepares it.
THE TWO VIDEOS I MADE
🎥 1. Technical explanation
In the first video I explained:
demosaicing
difference with traditional denoise
micro-detail and tonal quality
workflow
🎥 2. Field tests
In the second video I put PureRAW 6 to the test with real files:
DeepPRIME vs XD3 comparison
comparison with Lightroom's Denoise AI
tests on new compressed DNGs
The tests are deliberately done in a direct and unprepared manner.
WHEN IT REALLY MAKES SENSE
In my opinion PureRAW works best when:
you work at high ISO
images are printed
it becomes fine art
you work with landscape or architecture
maximum micro-detail is needed
For more “light” or social uses, Lightroom is often more than sufficient.
PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS
After testing it extensively, what I find most interesting is not only the noise reduction, but the way it preserves the structure of the image.
PureRAW tends to separate textures better, while other approaches often clean up more but compact the texture.
The difference is especially noticeable when you push the quality of the file.
If you’d like to try it, you can download the full trial version of DxO PureRAW (14 days, fully functional) and test it directly on your own files:
In addition, if you’re a new customer, you can use the discount code NICORUFFATO to get 15% off your purchase.
In the videos, you’ll find all the real-world tests and the full comparison to help you decide whether it truly makes sense in your workflow.
Comments